Ministry of Transport
 

child restraint statistics 2007

Child restraint use by children under 5 years: Results of national survey, 2007

The latest annual national survey of child restraint use in New Zealand by children under 5 years was carried out in October and November 2007. Children in more than 5,200 cars were observed at 112 sites throughout New Zealand. As in previous years, sites were surveyed during school hours in the school term. Results were weighted to reflect the population under five in each local authority.
The results from 2007 showed that across all sites, 91% of children under the age of 5 years were either in an infant seat, child seat, booster seat, or restrained by a child harness.

Fifty one percent of the children in the survey were appropriately restrained in child seats, 21% in booster seats, 19% in infant seats and 1% in child harnesses. A further 7% were restrained by adult safety belts. The remaining 2% were not restrained, including less than1% who were held on the knee of other passengers (see Table 1).

Table 1. Restraint type used by children under 5 (%)

Category 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003* 2004 2005 2006* 2007
Appropriate restraint used 75 79 82 86 86 87 89 91 91
Adult safety belt used 11 11 9 9 8 8 7 6 7
Unrestrained 14 11 9 5 5 5 4 4 2

*Rounded figures given; actual percentages add to 100%.

Regional Wearing Rates

National surveys are designed to provide a consistent measure of child restraint use over time, by surveying the same sites in each region each year. Table 2 shows the child restraint wearing rates by children under the age of five years in each Local Government region. In 2007 at least 200 children were surveyed in each region, except in Northland where 193 children were observed, Gisborne where 196 were observed and West Coast where 104 were observed.

Overall, the wearing of child restraints continues to increase or stay steady. Gisborne has increased after a drop in 2006. Child restraint wearing in Northland decreased 5% this year, but wearing rates stayed above the national average. Wearing rates in all other regions are being maintained or are continuing to increase in line with the national trend.

Table 2. Child restraint wearing rates, by region (%)

Local Government Region 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Northland 61 70 69 85 84 95 98 100 95
Auckland 70 75 77 83 82 81 86 92 90
Waikato 80 78 81 88 90 87 89 87 89
Bay of Plenty 75 79 78 87 78 81 91 89 86
Gisborne 47 68 79 69 76 88 92 83 100
Hawkes Bay 74 67 90 94 83 92 98 89 92
Taranaki 82 77 78 95 91 94 87 95 96
Manawatu - Wanganui 71 83 81 84 89 94 91 94 97
Wellington 81 81 83 82 90 89 91 92 90
Nelson - Marlborough 65 73 79 94 92 93 91 93 91
West Coast 80 82 84 92 92 92 92 93 96
Canterbury 87 88 94 91 93 93 83 85 90
Otago 89 87 97 97 90 95 91 91 98
Southland 84 87 76 81 88 83 94 92 90
All NZ 75 79 82 86 86 87 89 91 91

Metropolitan Area Wearing Rates

Child restraint wearing rates for selected metropolitan areas are presented in Table 3. In Manukau City, the rate has decreased since 2006 (from 96% to 91%) but is still much higher than in earlier years. All other metropolitan areas showed a steady wearing rate.

Table 3. Child restraint wearing rates, by metropolitan area (%)

Metropolitan areas 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
North Shore 84 91 90 79 88 80 94 93 92
Waitakere 76 80 78 86 91 95 91 90 89
Auckland City 71 81 82 88 85 88 86 86 89
Manukau 59 64 69 82 68 66 76 96 91
Hamilton 84 81 84 90 95 80 94 87 88
Wellington City 88 91 87 86 84 86 87 87 89
Christchurch 84 88 94 90 93 91 77 85 89
Dunedin 87 85 98 99 91 96 91 98 100

Local Authority Wearing Rates

At Local Authority level, sample sizes are relatively small and results should be treated with caution. For example, with a sample size of 100 and a wearing rate of 80%, the margin of error (based on a 95% confidence interval for the wearing rate) is approximately 8%.

Child restraint wearing rates at Local Authority level are presented in Table 4. Wearing rates for several neighbouring local authority areas have been combined to enable estimation of the wearing rate in areas with small samples. While small samples make it difficult to detect small changes in the wearing rate from year to year, these results are useful as an indication of how much improvement is needed. No wearing rate has been estimated where fewer than 70 people were sampled.

Table 4. Child restraint wearing rates by Territorial Local Authority, 2007

Local authority / authorities Children in sample % in child restraints
Northland    
Far North/Kaipara* 94
83
Whangarei 99
98
Auckland    
North Shore 254 92
Rodney/North Shore
300
92
Waitakere 132
89
Auckland 175
89
Manukau 95
91
Franklin/Papkura/Manukau 155
91
Waikato    
Waikato 94
83
Waipa 158
85
Matamata – Piako/South Waikato
89
91
Hamilton 246 88
Taupo 75
99
Bay of Plenty    
Tauranga 123 78
Western Bay of Plenty 110 79
Rotorua 75
95
Whakatane / Kawerau 112
92
Gisborne    
Gisborne 196
100
Hawkes Bay    
Wairoa/ Napier 226
91
Napier 159 92
Hastings 90
93
Hastings / Central Hawkes Bay 108
92
Taranaki    
New Plymouth 123
99
Stratford 75
91
South Taranaki 92
91
Manawatu-Wanganui    
Ruapehu / Rangitikei/ Wanganui 167
98
Manawatu / Tararua / Horowhenua 107
99
Palmerston North 118
96
Manawatu/Palmerston North
 85 99
Wellington    
Kapiti Coast / Porirua 125 84
Masterton / Carterton 145
82
Upper Hutt
74
99
Hutt City 92
98
Wellington City 179
89
Nelson-Marlborough / Tasman    
Nelson / Tasman 164
93
Marlborough / Kaikoura 151
88
West Coast    
Westland / Buller / Grey 104
96
Canterbury    
Christchurch 284
88
Waimakariri 20
Sample too small
Ashburton/Timaru 152 97
Otago    
Waitaki / Clutha/ Central Otago 165 96
Dunedin 160
100
Southland    
Gore 104
87
Invercargill 130 90
*Kaitaia excluded from sample in 2007 due to sampling issues

Police District Wearing Rates

National surveys are designed to provide a consistent measure of child restraint use over time, by surveying the same sites in each Police District each year. The child restraint wearing rates in each Police District are shown in Table 5. In 2007, at least 400 children were surveyed in each district, except in Northland (where 193 children were surveyed), Auckland (175 children) and in Counties-Manukau (155 children).

Child restraint wearing in Eastern, Canterbury and Southern Districts improved. Rates in Northland and Counties-Manukau declined, but did not decline below the national rate. No statistically significant change from 2006 was observed in the other Districts.

Table 5. Percentage of children in child restraints, by Police District (%)

Police District 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Northland 61 70 69 85 84 95 98 100 95
North Shore - Waitakere 79 84 82 83 91 89 93 93 90
Auckland 71 81 82 88 86 88 86 84 89
Counties - Manukau 63 64 69 75 69 68 86 97 91
Waikato 80 80 83 87 91 86 90 86 87
Bay of Plenty 76 77 76 88 78 83 90 90 87
Eastern 63 68 86 88 81 91 96 87 94
Central 77 80 80 88 90 93 90 94 95
Wellington 81 81 84 80 90 89 91 92 91
Tasman 70 75 80 94 92 93 91 93 92
Canterbury 87 88 94 90 93 93 83 85 90
Southern 88 87 89 93 89 91 92 92 95
All NZ 75 79 82 86 86 87 89 91 91

Police Area Wearing Rates

Child restraint wearing rates at Police Area level are presented in Table 6. Sample sizes for many areas are relatively small compared to those for Police Districts and results should be treated with caution. For example, with a sample size of 100 and a wearing rate of 80%, the margin of error (based on a 95% confidence interval for the wearing rate) is approximately 8%. While a sample as small as this makes it difficult to detect small changes in the wearing rate from year to year, these results are useful as an indication of how much improvement is needed. No wearing rate has been estimated where fewer than 70 people were sampled.

Table 6. Child restraint wearing rates by Police Area, 2007

Police Area Children in sample % in child restraints
Northland    
Far North 63*
Sample too small
Whangarei 130 98
North Shore / Waitakere    
Rodney/North Shore
300
91
North Shore 254 92
Waitakere 132 89
Auckland    
Auckland West 86
84
Auckland East 89
94
Counties / Manukau    
Counties-Manukau West/Central/East/South 155 91
Waikato    
Hamilton 246 88
Waikato East/West 304
86
Waikato West 252 84
Bay of Plenty    
Taupo 112
98
Western Bay of Plenty 233 78
Eastern Bay of Plenty 112
92
Rotorua 75
95
Eastern    
Gisborne 263
97
Napier 159 92
Hastings 108 92
Central    
New Plymouth 123 99
Taranaki Rural 167 91
Wanganui 119
99
Ruapehu/Wanganui 167
98
Palmerston North Rural 90
89
Palmerston North City/Rural 118
96
Wellington    
Kapiti - Mana 133
89
Wellington 144
88
Lower Hutt 92
98
Upper Hutt 74 99
Wairarapa 145
82
Tasman    
Nelson Bays 164
93
Marlborough 151
88
West Coast 104 96
Canterbury    
Northern Canterbury 115 93
Christchurch Central 86
83
Southern Canterbury 152
97
Mid-South Canterbury 103 86
Southern    
Dunedin 232
100
Otago Rural 93
96
Southland 234
88
*Kaitaia excluded from sample in 2007 due to sampling issues
land | sea | air | rail | home |