Child Restraint Statistics 2007

Last updated on 10/12/2008 3:36 p.m. 

Child restraint use by children under 5 years: Results of national survey, 2007

The latest annual national survey of child restraint use in New Zealand by children under 5 years was carried out in October and November 2007. Children in more than 5,200 cars were observed at 112 sites throughout New Zealand. As in previous years, sites were surveyed during school hours in the school term. Results were weighted to reflect the population under five in each local authority.

The results from 2007 showed that across all sites, 91% of children under the age of 5 years were either in an infant seat, child seat, booster seat, or restrained by a child harness.

Fifty one percent of the children in the survey were appropriately restrained in child seats, 21% in booster seats, 19% in infant seats and 1% in child harnesses. A further 7% were restrained by adult safety belts. The remaining 2% were not restrained, including less than1% who were held on the knee of other passengers (see Table 1).

Table 1. Restraint type used by children under 5 (%)
Category 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003* 2004  2005 2006* 2007
Appropriate restraint used  75  79  82  86  86  87  89  91  91
Adult safety belt used  11  11  9  9  8  8  7  6  7
Unrestrained  14  11  9  5  5  5  4  4  2

                     
*Rounded figures given; actual percentages add to 100%.

Regional Wearing Rates

National surveys are designed to provide a consistent measure of child restraint use over time, by surveying the same sites in each region each year. Table 2 shows the child restraint wearing rates by children under the age of five years in each Local Government region. In 2007 at least 200 children were surveyed in each region, except in Northland where 193 children were observed, Gisborne where 196 were observed and West Coast where 104 were observed.

Overall, the wearing of child restraints continues to increase or stay steady. Gisborne has increased after a drop in 2006. Child restraint wearing in Northland decreased 5% this year, but wearing rates stayed above the national average. Wearing rates in all other regions are being maintained or are continuing to increase in line with the national trend.

Table 2. Child restraint wearing rates, by region (%)
 Local Government Region 1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007 
 Northland  61  70  69  85  84  95  98  100  95
 Auckland  70  75  77  83  82  81  86  92  90
 Waikato  80  78  81  88  90  87  89  87  89
 Bay of Plenty  75  79  78  87  78  81  91  89  86
 Gisborne  47  68  79  69  76  88  92  83  100
 Hawkes Bay  74  67  90      94  83  92  98  89  92
 Taranaki  82  77  78  95  91  94  87  95  96
 Manawatu - Wanganui  71  83  81  84  89  94  91  94  97
 Wellington  81  81  83  82  90  89  91  92  90
 Nelson - Marlborough  65  73  79  94  92  93  91  93  91
 West Coast  80  82  84  92  92  92  92  93  96
 Canterbury  87  88  94  91  93  93  83  85  90
 Otago  89  87  97  97  90  95  91  91  98
 Southland  84  87  76 81  88  83  94  92  90
 All NZ  75  79  82  86  86  87  89  91  91

Metropolitan Area Wearing Rates

Child restraint wearing rates for selected metropolitan areas are presented in Table 3. In Manukau City, the rate has decreased since 2006 (from 96% to 91%) but is still much higher than in earlier years. All other metropolitan areas showed a steady wearing rate.

Table 3. Child restraint wearing rates, by metropolitan area (%)
Metropolitan areas   1999 2000  2001  2002   2003 2004  2005  2006  2007 
 North Shore  84  91  90  79  88  80  94  93  92
 Waitakere  76  80  78  86  91  95  91  90  89
 Auckland City  71  81  82  88  85  88  86  86  89
 Manukau  59  64  69  82  68  66  76  96  91
 Hamilton  84  81  84  90  95  80  94  87  88
 Wellington City  88  91  87  86  84  86  87  87  89
 Christchurch  84  88  94  90  93  91  77  85  89
 Dunedin  87  85  98  99 91  96  91  98 100

Local Authority Wearing Rates

At Local Authority level, sample sizes are relatively small and results should be treated with caution. For example, with a sample size of 100 and a wearing rate of 80%, the margin of error (based on a 95% confidence interval for the wearing rate) is approximately 8%.

Child restraint wearing rates at Local Authority level are presented in Table 4. Wearing rates for several neighbouring local authority areas have been combined to enable estimation of the wearing rate in areas with small samples. While small samples make it difficult to detect small changes in the wearing rate from year to year, these results are useful as an indication of how much improvement is needed. No wearing rate has been estimated where fewer than 70 people were sampled.

Table 4. Child restraint wearing rates by Territorial Local Authority, 2007
 Local authority / authorities  Children in sample % in child restraints 
 Northland    
 Far North/Kaipara*  94  83
 Whangarei  99  98
 Auckland    
 North Shore  254  92
 Rodney/North Shore  300  92
 Waitakere  132  89
 Auckland  175  89
 Manukau  95  91
 Franklin/Papkura/Manukau  155  91
 Waikato    
 Waikato  94  83
 Waipa 158 85
 Matamata – Piako/South Waikato 89 91
 Hamilton 246 88
 Taupo 75 99
 Bay of Plenty    
 Tauranga 123 78
 Western Bay of Plenty 110 79
 Rotorua 75 95
 Whakatane / Kawerau 112 92
 Gisborne    
 Gisborne  196  100
 Hawkes Bay    
 Wairoa/ Napier  226  91
 Napier  159  92
 Hastings  90  93
 Hastings / Central Hawkes Bay  108  92
 Taranaki    
 New Plymouth  123  99
 Stratford  75  91
 South Taranaki  92  91
 Manawatu-Wanganui    
 Ruapehu / Rangitikei/ Wanganui  167  98
 Manawatu / Tararua / Horowhenua  107  99
 Palmerston North  118  96
 Manawatu/Palmerston North  85  99
 Wellington    
 Kapiti Coast / Porirua  125  84
 Masterton / Carterton  145  82
 Upper Hutt  74  99
 Hutt City  92  98
 Wellington City  179  89
 Nelson-Marlborough / Tasman    
 Nelson / Tasman  164  93
 Marlborough / Kaikoura  151  88
 West Coast    
 Westland / Buller / Grey  104  96
 Canterbury    
 Christchurch  284  88
 Waimakariri  20 Sample too small
 Ashburton/Timaru  152  97
 Otago    
 Waitaki / Clutha/ Central Otago  165  96
 Dunedin  160  100
 Southland    
 Gore  104  87
 Invercargill  130  90

 

*Kaitaia excluded from sample in 2007 due to sampling issues

Police District Wearing Rates

National surveys are designed to provide a consistent measure of child restraint use over time, by surveying the same sites in each Police District each year. The child restraint wearing rates in each Police District are shown in Table 5. In 2007, at least 400 children were surveyed in each district, except in Northland (where 193 children were surveyed), Auckland (175 children) and in Counties-Manukau (155 children).

Child restraint wearing in Eastern, Canterbury and Southern Districts improved. Rates in Northland and Counties-Manukau declined, but did not decline below the national rate. No statistically significant change from 2006 was observed in the other Districts.

Table 5. Percentage of children in child restraints, by Police District (%)
 Police District  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007
 Northland  61  70  69  85  84  95  98  100  95
 North Shore - Waitakere  79  84  82  83  91  89  93  93  90
 Auckland  71  81  82  88  86  88  86  84  89
 Counties - Manukau  63  64  69  75  69  68  86  97  91
 Waikato  80  80  83  87  91  86  90  86  87
 Bay of Plenty  76  77  76  88  78  83  90  90  87
 Eastern  63  68  86  88  81  91  96  87  94
 Central  77  80  80  88  90  93  90  94  95
 Wellington  81  81  84  80  90  89  91  92  91
 Tasman  70  75  80  94  92  93  91  93 92
 Canterbury  87  88  94  90  93  93  83  85  90
 Southern  88  87  89  93  89  91  92  92  95
 All NZ

 75

 79

 82

 86

 86

 87

 89

 91

 91

Police Area Wearing Rates

Child restraint wearing rates at Police Area level are presented in Table 6. Sample sizes for many areas are relatively small compared to those for Police Districts and results should be treated with caution. For example, with a sample size of 100 and a wearing rate of 80%, the margin of error (based on a 95% confidence interval for the wearing rate) is approximately 8%. While a sample as small as this makes it difficult to detect small changes in the wearing rate from year to year, these results are useful as an indication of how much improvement is needed. No wearing rate has been estimated where fewer than 70 people were sampled.


Table 6. Child restraint wearing rates by Police Area, 2007
 Police Area  Children in sample  % in child restraints
 Northland    
 Far North

 63*

 Sample too small

 Whangarei

 130

 98

 North Shore / Waitakere    
 Rodney/North Shore

 300

 91

 North Shore

 254

 92

 Waitakere

 132

 89

 Auckland    
 Auckland West

 86

 84

 Auckland East

 89

 94

 Counties / Manukau    
 Counties-Manukau West/Central/East/South

 155

 91

 Waikato    
 Hamilton

 246

 88

 Waikato East/West

 304

 86

 Waikato West

 252

 84

 Bay of Plenty    
 Taupo

 112

 98

 Western Bay of Plenty

 233

 78

 Eastern Bay of Plenty

 112

 92

 Rotorua

 75

 95

 Eastern    
 Gisborne

 263

 97

 Napier

 159

 92

 Hastings

 108

 92

 Central    
 New Plymouth

 123

 99

 Taranaki Rural

 167

 91

 Wanganui

 119

 99

 Ruapehu/Wanganui

 167

 98

 Palmerston North Rural

 90

 89

 Palmerston North City/Rural

 118

 96

 Wellington    
 Kapiti - Mana

 133

 89

 Wellington

 144

 88

 Lower Hutt

 92

 98

 Upper Hutt

 74

 99

 Wairarapa

 145

 82

 Tasman    
 Nelson Bays

 164

 93

 Marlborough

 151

 88

 West Coast

 104

 96

 Canterbury
 Northern Canterbury

 115

 93

 Christchurch Central

 86

 83

 Southern Canterbury

 152

 97

 Mid-South Canterbury

 103

 86

 Southern  
 Dunedin

 232

 100

 Otago Rural

 93

 96

 Southland

 234

 88

*Kaitaia excluded from sample in 2007 due to sampling issues


Downloads