Safety Belt Statistics - Rear Seat 2008

Last updated on 16/12/2010 10:15 a.m. 

Safety belt wearing by adult rear seat passengers: Results of national survey, November/December 2008

The latest annual national survey of safety belt use in New Zealand by adults in the rear seats of cars was carried out in November and December 2008. A small number of sites were surveyed in February 2009 due to data collection issues. More than 9,000 adults seated in the rear seat of cars were observed at 139 sites around the country. As in previous years, each site was surveyed between 2 p.m. and 4 p.m. on Sunday afternoons during the school term. Only adults seated in the rear window positions were included in the survey.

In 2008, the safety belt wearing rate for rear seat adult passengers was 87%. This result is the same as in 2007 and is similar to 2004 and 2005 wearing rates (see Table 1).

Table 1. Safety belt wearing rates for adults in the rear seat (%)

Category

2000 

2001 

2001 

2002 

2003 

2004

2005 

2006 

2007 

2008

Males

72

66

66

76 

78

82

84

86

84

83

Females

79

73

73

83

84

88

89

91

90

89

Van
passengers

67

50

50

69

72

72

75

79

75

75

New Zealand

76

70

70

80

81

86

86

89

87

87

Female rear seat passengers continued to have a higher rear seat safety belts wearing rate than males (see Table 1). All adult passengers had a lower wearing rate in vans. Rear seat passengers who appeared to be aged 15-19 years were recorded as teenagers. The wearing rate among teenagers was 86%. More teenage girls were wearing their safety belts (88%) than teenage boys (84%). These are similar to the corresponding adult rates.

Graph showing safety belt wearing rates for adults in the rear seat up to 2008

Regional Wearing Rates

National restraint wearing surveys are designed to provide a consistent measure of safety belt use over time, by surveying the same sites in each region each year. In 2008, at least 200 vehicle occupants were surveyed in each region, except in Gisborne where 65 people were surveyed and on the West Coast where 170 people were surveyed.

The number of vehicles with rear seat passengers observed in Gisborne was too small to provide a wearing rate in 2008. The survey sites for Gisborne will be reviewed in the next survey to ensure maximum traffic is being captured.

Table 2 shows the rear seat safety belt wearing rates in each Local Government region over the last ten years. Overall, the wearing of rear seat safety belts has decreased slightly over the last year in Auckland, Waikato and Otago. The Bay of Plenty has returned to the level observed in 2005. The Gisborne rate appears to have declined from 2005 – 2007 levels but this may be due to the atypically small sample.

Wearing rates in all other regions have not changed markedly since last year, and are continuing to follow a similar pattern to the national wearing rate.

Table 2. Rear seat adult safety belt wearing rates by region (%)

Local Government Region

2000 

2001 

2002 

2003 

2004 

2005 

2006 

2007 

2008 

Northland

88

72

84

87

89 

94 

99

71 

73 

Auckland

84

84

84

82

90

82

93

92

88

Waikato

78

80

78

82

85

83

83

88

83

Bay of Plenty

66

53

79

70

78

85

90

76

86

Gisborne

53

55

54

69

59

97

86

92

Sample too small

Hawkes Bay

47

52

81

76

87

96

90

84

87 

Taranaki

66

65

81

83

81

92

91

93

94

Manawatu-Wanganui

83

73

79

85

85

87

94

92

92

Wellington

78

71

77

82

87

84

89

87

89

Nelson-Marlborough

85

82

77

90

93

89

88

87

83

West Coast

75

82

79

78

85

89

95

91

91

Canterbury

76

58

76

82

88

85

87

91

92

Otago

87

85

88

79

78

88

92

84

79

Southland

74

76

67

88

74

70

64

71

78

All New Zealand

76

70

80

81

86

86

89

87

87

Note. The accuracy of the wearing rates shown here depends on the sample sizes (the number of car occupants observed). If the sample size is small, the data may show large random fluctuations in the observed wearing rate.

Local Authority Wearing Rates

At Local Authority level, sample sizes are relatively small and results should be treated with caution. For example, with a sample size of 100 and a wearing rate of 75% the margin of error  is approximately 9%. While small samples make it difficult to detect small changes in the wearing rate from year to year, these results are useful as an indication of how much improvement is needed. No wearing rate has been estimated where fewer than 75 people were sampled.

Table 3. Rear seat adult safety belt wearing rates by Local Authority (%)

Local Authority/authorities     People in sample  Wearing rate 2008 

Northland

Far North

101

74 

Whangarei

127

72

Whangarei/Kaipara

169

73

Auckland

North Shore

270

86

Rodney

398

92

Waitakere

181

73

Auckland

319

83

Manukau

256

90

Papakura/Franklin

238

100

Franklin

188

100

Waikato

Thames-Coromandel

165

95

Hauraki

77

78

Waikato

352

92

Hamilton City

301

85

Matamata-Piako

84

90

Waipa/Otorohanga

170

80

South Waikato

189

85

Waitomo

76

82

Otorohanga

98

77

Taupo

269

80

Bay of Plenty

Tauranga/Western Bay of Plenty

159

97 

Western Bay of Plenty

97

96

Rotorua

237

64

Whakatane/Opotiki/Kawerau

102

99

Gisborne

Gisborne                                      

65

Sample too small

Hawke's Bay

Hastings

107

89

Napier

125

85

Central Hawke's Bay

83

93

Wairoa/Hastings

164

82

Taranaki

New Plymouth

368

93

Stratford

83

100

Stratford/South Taranaki

151

94

Manawatu-Wanganui

Rangitikei/Ruapehu

157

88

Wanganui

124

88

Manawatu

110

92

Palmerston North

186

95

Tararua

86

94

Horowhenua

103

96

Wellington

Kapiti Coast

211

86

Porirua

94

81

Upper Hutt

105

92

Hutt

339

91

Wellington City

79

76

Masterton

110

91

Carterton/South Wairarapa

180

96

Nelson-Marlborough/Tasman

Nelson/Marlborough

145

73

Marlborough    

88

65

Tasman

149

93

West Coast

Buller/Westland

81

94

Grey

89

91

Canterbury

Kaikoura/Hurunui

123

85

Waimakariri

151

99

Christchurch City

195

94

Selwyn

97

90

Ashburton

80

95

Timaru

152

89

Mackenzie/Waimate

135

84

Otago

Waitaki

128

84

Central Otago/Queenstown Lakes

155

84

Queenstown Lakes

81

80

Dunedin

210

61

Clutha

121

100

Southland

Gore

140

79

Invercargill/Southland

132

77

 

Police District Wearing Rates

National restraint wearing surveys are designed to provide a consistent measure of safety belt use over time, by surveying the same sites in each Police District each year. In 2008, at least 270 vehicle occupants were surveyed in each district. Table 4 shows the rear safety belt wearing rates in each Police District over the last ten years.

Overall, rear safety belt wearing stayed relatively constant in 2008. Waitemata and Auckland Police Districts showed a decrease in rear safety belt wearing. Counties / Manukau showed an increase in wearing rate. Wearing rates in all other police districts were approximately constant over the last year.

Table 4. Rear seat adult safety belt wearing rates by Police District (%)

Police District 

2000 

2001 

2002 

2003 

2004 

2005 

2006 

2007 

2008 

Northland 

88

72 

84 

87 

89 

94 

99 

71 

73 

Waitemata

90 

94 

85 

82 

93

91

96 

96

86

Auckland

79

72

78

87

80

72

98

97

83

Counties Manukau

73

79

86

78

89

70

83

83

95

Waikato

77

80

79

81

85

83

84

86

83

Bay of Plenty

72

60

79

74

81

85

88

84

84

Eastern

49

53

77

75

84

96

89

87

84

Central

75

68

80

85

84

89

93

92

93

Wellington

78

71

77

82

87

84

89

87

89

Tasman

79

82

74

89

91

88

89

85

85

Canterbury

76

58

78

81

87

85

87

93

93

Southern

81

59

81

82

77

83

84

81

79

All NZ

76

70

80

81

86

 86

89

87

87

 

Police Area Wearing Rates

Sample sizes for many Police Areas are relatively small compared to those for Police Districts and results should be treated with caution. For example, with a sample size of 150 and a wearing rate of 75% the margin of error*  is approximately 7%. While a sample as small as this makes it difficult to detect small changes in the wearing rate from year to year, these results are useful as an indication of how much improvement is needed. No wearing rate has been estimated where fewer than 75 people were sampled.

Table 5. Rear seat adult safety belt wearing rates by Police Area (%)

Police Area                         People in sample      Wearing rate 2008 

Northland 

Far North

101

74 

Whangarei

169

73

Waitemata

North Shore

270 

86

Waitakere

181

73

Rodney

398

92

Auckland

Auckland

266

83

Counties Manukau

Manukau West

88 

72 

Manukau Central

168

99

Manukau South

238

100

Waikato

Hamilton

301 

85

Waikato East

284

74

Waikato West

598

87

Bay of Plenty

Western Bay of Plenty

159

97

Eastern Bay of Plenty

102

99

Rotorua

230

71

Taupo

558

82

Eastern

Gisborne

122

74

Napier

125

85

Hastings

190

91

Central

New Plymouth

368

93

Taranaki rural

151

94

Wanganui

215

88

Ruapehu

66

Sample too small

Wanganui/Ruapehu

281

88

Palmerston North City

186

95

Palmerston North Rural

299

94

Wellington

Kapiti-Mana

305

85

Wellington

79

76

Lower Hutt

339

91

Upper Hutt

105

92

Wairarapa

290

94

Tasman

Nelson Bays

206

91

Marlborough

161

70

West Coast

170

92

Canterbury

Northern Canterbury

201

99

Christchurch Central

89

94

Southern Canterbury

287

87

Mid-South Canterbury

283

93

Southern

Dunedin

331

76

Otago Rural

283

84

Southland

272

78

Download the full document:

Safety belt wearing by adult rear seat passengers
was prepared by Transport Monitoring, March 2009.

*Margin of error such that wearing rate +- margin of error describes a 95% confidence interval for the wearing rate.