Safety Belt Statistics - Rear Seat 2007

Last updated on 3/04/2009 1:47 p.m. 

Safety belt wearing by adult rear seat passengers: Results of national survey, November/December 2007

The latest annual national survey of safety belt use in New Zealand by adults in the rear seats of cars was carried out in November and December 2007. A small number of sites were surveyed in February 2008 due to data collection issues. More than 9000 adults seated in the rear seat of cars were observed at 139 sites around the country. As in previous years, each site was surveyed between 2pm and 4pm on Sunday afternoons during the school term. Only adults seated in the rear window positions were included in the survey.
 
In 2007, the safety belt wearing rate for rear seat adult passengers was 87%. This result is slightly lower than in 2006 and is similar to 2004 and 2005 wearing rates (see Table 1).

Table 1. Safety belt wearing rates for adults in the rear seat (%)
 Category 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Males

72

66

76

78

82

84

86

84

Females

79

73

83

84

88

89

91

90

Van passengers

67

50

69

72

72

75

79

75

New Zealand

76

70

80

81

86

86

89

87

Female rear seat passengers continued to have a higher rear seat safety belts wearing rate than males (see Table 1). All adult passengers had a lower wearing rate in vans. Rear seat passengers who appeared to be aged 15-19 years were recorded as teenagers. The wearing rate among teenagers was 85%. More teenage girls were wearing their safety belts (86%) than teenage boys (83%). These are similar to the corresponding adult rates, but slightly lower.


Graph showing Safety belt wearing rates for adults in the rear seat, 1998-2007
Figure 1. Safety belt wearing rates for adults in the rear seat, 1998-2007

Regional Wearing Rates

National restraint wearing surveys are designed to provide a consistent measure of safety belt use over time, by surveying the same sites in each region each year. In 2007, at least 200 vehicle occupants were surveyed in each region, except in Gisborne where 167 people were surveyed and West Coast where 145 people were surveyed.

Table 2 shows the rear seat safety belt wearing rates in each Local Government region over the last ten years. Overall, the wearing of rear seat safety belts has decreased slightly. Waikato and Canterbury showed the greatest statistically significant improvements in 2007. Northland, Bay of Plenty, and Otago all decreased significantly. Southland improved on its wearing rate for 2006, back up to approximately 2005 levels.

Wearing rates in all other regions have not changed markedly since last year, and are continuing to follow a similar pattern to the national wearing rate.

Table 2. Safety belt wearing rates by region from 2000 - 2007
Local Government Region 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Northland
88
72
84
87
89
94
99
71
Auckland
84
84
84
82
90
82
93
92
Waikato
78
80
78
82
85
83
83
88
Bay of Plenty
66
53
79
70
78
85
90
76
Gisborne
53
55
54
69
59
97
86
92
Hawkes Bay
47
52
81
76
87
96
90
84
Taranaki
66
65
81
83
81
92
91
93
Manawatu-Wanganui
83
73
79
85
85
87
94
92
Wellington
78
71
77
82
87
84
89
87
Nelson-Marlborough
85
82
77
90
93
89
88
87
West Coast
75
82
79
78
85
89
95
91
Canterbury
76
58
76
82
88
85
87
91
Otago
87
85
88
79
78
88
92
84
Southland
74
76
67
88
74
70
64
71
All NZ
76
70
80
81
86
86
89
87

Note. The accuracy of the wearing rates shown here depends on the sample sizes (the number of car occupants observed). If the sample size is small, the data may show large random fluctuations in the observed wearing rate.

Territorial Local Authority Wearing Rates

At Local Authority level, sample sizes are relatively small and results should be treated with caution. For example, with a sample size of 100 and a wearing rate of 75% the margin of error1 is approximately 9%. While small samples make it difficult to detect small changes in the wearing rate from year to year, these results are useful as an indication of how much improvement is needed. No wearing rate has been estimated where fewer than 80 people were sampled.

Table 3. Rear seat adult safety belt wearing rates by Territorial Local Authority (%)
Local authority/ authorities People in sample Wearing rate 2007

Northland

Far North 117 80
Whangarei 196 67
Whangarei/Kaipara 232 67

Auckland

North Shore 251 96
Rodney 296 98
Waitakere 148 93
Auckland 234 97
Manukau 291 77
Papakura 141 94
Franklin 67 Sample too small

Waikato

Thames-Coromandel / Hauraki 165 95
Waikato 263 79
Hamilton City 345 82
Matamata-Piako 51 Sample too small
Waipa 220 92
South Waikato 307 99
Waitomo 100 83
Otorohanga 128 89
Taupo 238 89

Bay of Plenty / Gisborne

Tauranga 158 84
Western Bay of Plenty 137 90
Rotorua 237 64
Whakatane / Opotiki / Kawerau 151 74

Gisborne

Gisborne 167 92

Hawkes Bay

Hastings / Napier2 / Central Hawkes Bay 131 92
Wairoa 105 74

Taranaki

New Plymouth 449 92
Stratford 92 97
South Taranaki 91 97

Manawatu-Wanganui

Rangitikei / Ruapehu / Wanganui 189 86
Manawatu 117 93
Palmerston North 261 95
Tararua / Horowhenua 129 91

Wellington

Kapiti Coast 267 98
Porirua 76 95
Upper Hutt 129 84
Hutt 153 71
Wellington City 75 80
Masterton 176 85
Carterton / South Wairarapa 169 88

Nelson-Marlborough / Tasman

Nelson 88 88
Marlborough 100 82
Tasman 113 90

West Coast

Buller 23 Sample too small
Grey 88 86
Buller / Grey / Westland 145 91

Canterbury

Kaikoura 115 74
Hurunui 88 100
Waimakariri 98 91
Christchurch City 226 83
Selwyn 180 99
Ashburton 86 99
Timaru 143 97
Mackenzie / Waimate 90 93

Otago

Waitake 101 89
Central Otago 82 70
Queenstown-Lakes 167 72
Dunedin 155 98
Clutha 71 Sample too small

Southland

Gore 133 70
Invercargill / Southland 105 73

 

Police District Wearing Rates

National restraint wearing surveys are designed to provide a consistent measure of safety belt use over time, by surveying the same sites in each Police District each year. In 2007, at least 220 vehicle occupants were surveyed in each district. Table 4 shows the rear safety belt wearing rates in each Police District over the last ten years.

Overall, rear safety belt wearing stayed relatively constant in 2007. Northland and Bay of Plenty Police Districts showed a decrease in rear safety belt wearing. Canterbury showed an increase in wearing rate. Wearing rates in all other police districts were approximately constant over the last year.

Table 4. Rear seat adult safety belt wearing rates by Police District (%)
 Police District 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Northland

88

72 84 87 89 94 99 71
Waitemata 90 94 85 82 93 91 96 96
Auckland 79 72 78 87 80 72 98 97
Counties Manukau 73 79 86 78 89 70 83 83
Waikato 77 80 79 81 85 83 84 86
Bay of Plenty 72 60 79 74 81 85 88 84
Eastern 49 53 77 75 84 96 89 87
Central 75 68 80 85 84 89 93 92
Wellington 78 71 77 82 87 84 89 87
Tasman 79 82 74 89 91 88 89 85
Canterbury 76 58 78 81 87 85 87 93
Southern 81 59 81 82 77

83

84 81
All NZ 76 70 80 81 86 86 89 87

 Police Area Wearing Rates

Sample sizes for many Police Areas are relatively small compared to those for Police Districts and results should be treated with caution. For example, with a sample size of 150 and a wearing rate of 75% the margin of error 1 is approximately 7%. While a sample as small as this makes it difficult to detect small changes in the wearing rate from year to year, these results are useful as an indication of how much improvement is needed. No wearing rate has been estimated where fewer than 80 people were sampled.


<><><><><><><><>
Table 5. Rear seat adult safety belt wearing rates by Police Area (%)
Police Area People in sample Wearing rate 2007
Northland
Far North

117

80

Whangarei

232

67

North Shore / Waitakere
North Shore

251

96

Waitakere

148

93

Rodney

296

98

Auckland
 
 
Auckland

234

97

Counties Manukau
Manukau West

149

76

Manukau Central

142

77

Manukau South

208

93

Waikato
Hamilton

345

82

Waikato East

216

94

Waikato West

711

86

Bay of Plenty
Western Bay of Plenty

295

86

Eastern Bay of Plenty

151

74

Rotorua

237

64

Taupo

545

94

Eastern
Gisborne

272

85

Napier

42

Sample too small

Hastings

89

97

Central 
New Plymouth

449

92

Taranaki rural

183

97

Wanganui

61

Sample too small

Ruapehu

65

Sample too small

Wanganui/ Ruapehu

126

87

Palmerston North City

261

95

Palmerston North rural

246

92

Wellington
Kapiti-Mana

343

97

Wellington

75

80

Lower Hutt

153

71

Upper Hutt

129

84

Wairarapa

345

86

Tasman
Nelson Bays

201

89

Marlborough

215

78

West Coast

145

91

Canterbury
Northern Canterbury

186

95

Christchurch Central

121

68

Southern Canterbury

233

95

Mid-South Canterbury

371

99

Southern
Dunedin

226

97

Otago Rural

350

76

Southland

238

71



 



Download the full document:

 


  1. Margin of error such that wearing rate +- margin of error describes a 95% confidence interval for the wearing rate. 
  2. Sample sizes in the Napier and Hastings areas were reduced due to survey problems in 2007. Full surveys will be obtained in 2008.